← Search another job

Range Managers

Research or study range land management practices to provide sustained production of forage, livestock, and wildlife.

U.S. Workers

25,590

Median Salary

$67,950

10-Year Growth

+3.4%

Annual Openings

2,500

Typical entry: Bachelor's degree

Minimal RiskImminent Risk53%MEDIUM

16 of 16 tasks have some AI capability

Exposure Trend

Mar53.14%Apr53.14%May53.14%Jun53.14%

This score reflects estimated AI technical capability for tasks in this occupation. It does not predict employment changes, and it does not account for company-specific constraints, regulation, or adoption barriers.

Fully Automatable (1)

AI could handle these end-to-end

Study grazing patterns to determine number and kind of livestock that can be most profitably grazed and to determine the best grazing seasons.

AI: Fully automatable - AI can fully analyze grazing patterns using telemetry, remote sensing and economic/ecological models to recommend stocking rates and optimal seasons with sufficient accuracy for decision-making.

imp: 3.7

Human in the Loop (15)

AI could assist, human oversight required

Regulate grazing, and help ranchers plan and organize grazing systems in order to manage, improve and protect rangelands and maximize their use.

AI: Partial - AI can design optimized grazing plans and provide monitoring support, yet actual regulation, enforcement, and relationship-building with ranchers require human authority and social negotiation.

imp: 4.4

Measure and assess vegetation resources for biological assessment companies, environmental impact statements, and rangeland monitoring programs.

AI: Partial - AI can analyze imagery and sensor data to measure and assess vegetation for many monitoring purposes, but comprehensive biological assessments and legally defensible EIS inputs often need field sampling and expert interpretation.

imp: 4.0

Maintain soil stability and vegetation for non-grazing uses, such as wildlife habitats and outdoor recreation.

AI: Partial - AI can generate management plans to maintain soil stability and vegetation and predict outcomes, but implementing, adapting, and validating those measures in the field requires human operations and oversight.

imp: 4.0

Mediate agreements among rangeland users and preservationists as to appropriate land use and management.

AI: Partial - AI can facilitate mediation by modeling scenarios and drafting agreements, but the interpersonal negotiation, trust-building, and final dispute resolution are human-centric activities.

imp: 3.9

Manage forage resources through fire, herbicide use, or revegetation to maintain a sustainable yield from the land.

AI: Partial - AI can plan and model fire regimes, herbicide applications, and revegetation strategies, but execution of hazardous treatments, permit compliance, and on-the-ground adaptive management need human control and legal authority.

imp: 3.9

Study rangeland management practices and research range problems to provide sustained production of forage, livestock, and wildlife.

AI: Partial - AI can analyze literature, remote sensing, and models to identify rangeland problems and propose management options, but it cannot perform on-the-ground experiments or field validation required for complete autonomy.

imp: 3.9

Offer advice to rangeland users on water management, forage production methods, and control of brush.

AI: Partial - AI can generate site-specific water, forage, and brush-control recommendations from data and best practices, but in-person assessment, local nuance, and stakeholder communication limit full automation.

imp: 3.8

Plan and direct construction and maintenance of range improvements such as fencing, corrals, stock-watering reservoirs and soil-erosion control structures.

AI: Partial - AI can produce plans, specifications and maintenance schedules for fences, reservoirs and erosion control, yet cannot physically supervise, adapt in real time on site, or perform construction work.

imp: 3.8

Tailor conservation plans to landowners' goals, such as livestock support, wildlife, or recreation.

AI: Partial - AI can tailor conservation plans by combining landowner goals with spatial and ecological data, but implementation, negotiation, and regulatory/legal sign-off require human leadership.

imp: 3.8

Develop technical standards and specifications used to manage, protect and improve the natural resources of range lands and related grazing lands.

AI: Partial - AI can draft technical standards and specifications by synthesizing regulations and science, yet formal development, consensus-building, and field validation remain human-centered activities.

imp: 3.8

Plan and implement revegetation of disturbed sites.

AI: Partial - AI can design revegetation plans (species selection, timing, inputs) from site data and models, but cannot carry out physical planting, soil preparation, or on-site adaptive management alone.

imp: 3.5

Study forage plants and their growth requirements to determine varieties best suited to particular range.

AI: Partial - AI can evaluate forage species and growth requirements using datasets, climate and soil models to recommend varieties, but experimental field trials and local validation are still necessary.

imp: 3.5

Manage private livestock operations.

AI: Partial - AI can automate many managerial functions (scheduling, monitoring, financial planning, health alerts) for livestock operations, but cannot perform hands-on animal care, make legal decisions, or provide on-farm leadership independently.

imp: 3.3

Develop methods for protecting range from fire and rodent damage and for controlling poisonous plants.

AI: Partial - AI can develop models and protocols to reduce fire risk, manage rodents and control poisonous plants, but field deployment, regulatory compliance, and ecological monitoring need human execution.

imp: 3.2

Develop new and improved instruments and techniques for activities such as range reseeding.

AI: Partial - AI can design, model, and suggest novel instruments and reseeding techniques using data and simulation, but cannot perform physical prototyping and field validation independently.

imp: 2.9

Skills for this role (35)

Active ListeningEssentialCritical ThinkingCoreSpeakingCoreJudgment and Decision MakingCoreReading ComprehensionCoreCoordinationCoreComplex Problem SolvingCoreMonitoringCoreNegotiationCoreScienceCore
1 / 4