Maintain order in courts of law.
U.S. Workers
16,910
Median Salary
$57,050
10-Year Growth
-2.2%
Annual Openings
1,800
Typical entry: High school diploma or equivalent
12 of 13 tasks have some AI capability
Exposure Trend
This score reflects estimated AI technical capability for tasks in this occupation. It does not predict employment changes, and it does not account for company-specific constraints, regulation, or adoption barriers.
Maintain court docket.
AI: Fully automatable - Docket management (scheduling, notifications, conflict checks, updates) is routine and can be fully automated by AI systems.
Announce entrance of judge.
AI: Fully automatable - AI can reliably perform scheduled or sensor‑triggered public address announcements of a judge's entrance with high consistency and low risk.
Screen persons entering courthouse using magnetometers, x-ray machines, and other devices to collect and retain unauthorized firearms and other contraband.
AI: Partial - AI can automate detection in X‑ray/metal‑detector scans and flag contraband, but it cannot physically seize items or exercise the legal authority to retain them.
Provide jury escort to restaurant and other areas outside of courtroom to prevent jury contact with public.
AI: Partial - AI can support jury movements with routing, monitoring, and alerts to minimize contact, but cannot physically prevent contact or replace an in‑person escort for security and legal reasons.
Provide security by patrolling interior and exterior of courthouse and escorting judges and other court employees.
AI: Partial - Surveillance, analytics, and robotic patrols can assist monitoring, but providing personal escorts and dynamic protective responses still require human officers.
Enforce courtroom rules of behavior and warn persons not to smoke or disturb court procedure.
AI: Partial - Automated detection and public-address warnings can enforce simple rules, but authoritative enforcement and managing courtroom behavior nuances require humans.
Guard lodging of sequestered jury.
AI: Partial - AI can monitor sequestered lodging with cameras, sensors, and access controls, yet cannot fully replace on‑site security personnel for enforcement and emergency response.
Maintain order in courtroom during trial and guard jury from outside contact.
AI: Partial - AI can monitor for disturbances and alert staff, but maintaining order during trials and physically protecting jurors from outside contact demands human intervention.
Check courtroom for security and cleanliness and assure availability of sundry supplies, such as notepads, for use by judge, jurors, and attorneys.
AI: Partial - Sensors and inventory systems can monitor cleanliness and supply levels and trigger restocking, yet final inspections and ad hoc provisioning are typically handled by people.
Screen, control, and handle evidence and exhibits during court proceedings.
AI: Partial - AI can track evidence digitally, manage chain-of-custody records, and present exhibits, but physical control, secure handling, and legal custody require human agents.
Report need for police or medical assistance to sheriff's office.
AI: Partial - AI can automatically generate and transmit alerts (via sensors, apps, or dispatch interfaces) but lacks legal/operational authority and often requires human confirmation in critical emergencies.
Stop people from entering courtroom while judge charges jury.
AI: Partial - AI can control electronic access systems and provide real‑time monitoring and alerts to prevent entry, but cannot physically interpose or exercise courtroom authority, so human bailiffs remain necessary.
Escort prisoners to and from courthouse and maintain custody of prisoners during court proceedings.
AI: Not automatable - Escorting and maintaining custody of prisoners requires physical control, legal authority, and immediate human judgement that AI cannot provide.